| Course Name |
Masculinities and Society
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
SOC 316
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionLecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course aims to discuss the basic concepts and theories of masculinities studies and to analyze the gendered practices of man in societies. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | This course introduces the masculinity studies and its importance for a better understanding of society and gender relations. The course starts with conceptual descriptions and theoretical discussions of masculinity and then continues with various studies with interdisciplinary and intersectionality lens. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction and overview of the course | |
| 2 | Introducing Masculinities | Connell, R. W. (2005). “Introducing Masculinities” chap. 1 in Masculinities, 2nd edn. (Berkeley: University of California Press). |
| 3 | Power, Hegemonic Masculinity, and Gender Inequality | R. W. Connell and James W. Messerschmidt (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829-859. Richard Howson and Jeff Hearn (2020). “Hegemony, hegemonic masculinity, and beyond” chap. 3 in Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies. (NY: Routledge). |
| 4 | Intersectionality | Ann-Dorte Christensen and Sune Qvotrup Jensen (2020). “Intersectionality” chap. 7 in Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies. (NY: Routledge). |
| 5 | Identities and Intersectionalities: Class | Michael R. M. Ward (2020). “Men, masculinities and social class” chap. 18 in Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies. (NY: Routledge). Tobias Hübinette (2020). “White masculinity” chap. 12 in Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies. (NY: Routledge). |
| 6 | Masculinity and Symbolic Violence | Beate Krais (1999): “On Bourdieu’s Masculine Domination”, Travail, Genre et Socieities, Volume 1, Issue 1. |
| 7 | In Class Film: The Mask You Live in | |
| 8 | Discussion of the Movie and Preparation for the Midterm | |
| 9 | Midterm Exam | |
| 10 | Masculinity, Media and Social Justice | Ralph R. Donald (2001). “Masculinity and Machismo in Hollywood's War Films” chap. 9 in The Masculinities Reader. (Oxford: Wiley). |
| 11 | Fatherhood Studies | David H.J. Morgan (2001). “Family, Gender and Masculinities” chap. 12 in The Masculinities Reader. (Oxford: Wiley). |
| 12 | Disability and Masculinities | Cassandra Loeser, Vicki Crowley and Barbara Pini (2017). “Corporeality, Pedagogy and Critique of Otherness”, in Disability and Masculinities, (Palgrave, Macmillan), xv-xIvii. |
| 13 | Disability and Masculinities | Russel Shuttleworth, Nikki Wedgwood and Nathan Wilson (2012). “Dilemma of Disabled Mascunility”, in Man and Masculinites, Sage, s. 174-194. |
| 14 | Masculinity studies in Turkey | Cenk Ozbay and Ozan Soybakis (2020). Political Masculinities: Gender, Power, and Change in Turkey, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(1), 27–50. Betül Ekşi (2018). Police and Masculinities in Transition in Turkey: From Macho to Reformed to Militarized Policing, Men and Masculinities, 22(3). |
| 15 | Semester Review | |
| 16 | Final Exam |
| Course Notes/Textbooks |
|
|
| Suggested Readings/Materials |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
10
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury | ||
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
40
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
50
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
2
|
50
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
50
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
3
|
42
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
40
|
40
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
50
|
50
|
| Total |
180
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To have the knowledge of classical and contemporary theories in sociology, and be able to comparatively analyze these theories. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 2 |
To have the knowledge of main methodological approaches in sociology as well as social research and data analysis methods. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To have knowledge in the fields of general sociology, sociology of institutions, social structure and change, and applied sociology. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to determine the appropriate methods in the design of the planning stage and conclusion of a sociological project, individually or as part of a team. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to diagnose the social dynamics behind personal problems by using sociological imagination. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to define social problems at local, national, and global level, and offer new policies for solutions. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to apply commonly-used computer programs for data collection and analysis in sociological research. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to develop a socially responsible, scientific and ethical perspective regarding the collection, analysis, interpretation and presentation of data. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to analyze different aspects of the social world by drawing on the knowledge produced by other disciplines of the social sciences. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to constantly renew herself/himself professionally by following scientific and technological developments in sociology and social research. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect sociological data and communicate with sociologists and other social scientists in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..