| Course Name |
Selected Topics in Sociology
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
SOC 422
|
Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | Group WorkQ&ALecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | - | |||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course critically examines the concept of modernity and challenges the idea of a single, universal path to being modern. It introduces theories of multiple and alternative modernities and explores non-Western, postcolonial, and global experiences of modernity. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The course covers classical theories of modernity, critiques of modernization theories, Eurocentrism, relationship between modernity and colonialism, emergence of post-colonial societies and post-colonial theories and revisiting the idea of modernity and multiple modernities. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction: What Is Modernity? | |
| 2 | Classical Theories of Modernity | Max Weber. (1978). “Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology.” University of California Press, (Rationalization). Emile Durkheim. (1933). “The Division of Labour in Society.” Macmillan, (Introduction). |
| 3 | Modernization Theory | W.W. Rostow. (1960). “The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto.” Cambridge University Press, (Chapter 2). Talcott Parsons. (1971). “The System of Modern Societies.” Prentice-Hall, (Excerpt). |
| 4 | Critiques of Modernization Theory | Immanuel Wallerstein. (2004). “World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction.” Duke University Press, (Chapter 1). Andre Gunder Frank. (1966). “The Development of Underdevelopment.” Monthly Review, 18(4): 17-31. |
| 5 | Modernity and Colonialism | Edward Said. (1978). “Orientalism.” Western Books, (Introduction). Bryan S. Turner. (1978). “Marx and the End of Orientalism.” Routledge. Julian Go. (2016). “Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory.” Oxford University Press, (Chapter 1: Introduction). |
| 6 | Postcolonial Critiques of Modernity | Dipesh Chakrabarty. (2000). “Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference.” Princeton University Press, (Introduction). Raewyn Connell. (2007). “Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science.” Polity Press, (Chapter 1). |
| 7 | Multiple Modernities | S.N. Eisenstadt. (2000). “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus, 129(1): 1-29. Peter Wagner. (2008). “Modernity as Experience and Interpretation: A New Sociology of Modernity.” Polity Press, (Chapter 3). |
| 8 | Midterm Exam | |
| 9 | Multiple Modernities | Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar. (1999). “On Alternative Modernities.” Public Culture, 11(1): 1-18. Arjun Appadurai. (1996). “Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.” University of Minnesota Press, (Chapter 1). |
| 10 | Alternative Modernities | José Casanova. (1994). “Public Religions in the Modern World.” University of Chicago Press, (Chapter 1). S.N. Eisenstadt. (2003). “Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities.” Brill, (Excerpt). |
| 11 | Religion and Alternative Modernities | Benedict Anderson. (1983). “Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.” Verso, (Chapter 1). Partha Chatterjee. (1993). “The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories.” Princeton University Press, (Introduction). |
| 12 | Nationalism, State, and Modernity | Ulrich Beck. (1992). “Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.” Sage Publications, (Introduction). Anthony Giddens. (1990). “The Consequences of Modernity.” Stanford University Press, (Chapter 1). |
| 13 | Globalization and Late / Reflexive Modernity | Mike Featherstone. (1995). “Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity.” Sage Publications, (Chapter 4). Zygmunt Bauman. (2000). “Liquid Modernity.” Polity Press, (Introduction). |
| 14 | Everyday Life and Cultural Modernities | Gurminder K. Bhambra. (2014). “Connected Sociologies.” Bloomsbury Academic, (Conclusion). |
| 15 | Review of the Semester | |
| 16 | Final Exam |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | |
| Suggested Readings/Materials |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | ||
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
2
|
20
|
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
30
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
50
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
50
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
50
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
3
|
42
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
2
|
15
|
30
|
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
24
|
24
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
36
|
36
|
| Total |
180
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To have the knowledge of classical and contemporary theories in sociology, and be able to comparatively analyze these theories. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 2 |
To have the knowledge of main methodological approaches in sociology as well as social research and data analysis methods. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To have knowledge in the fields of general sociology, sociology of institutions, social structure and change, and applied sociology. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to determine the appropriate methods in the design of the planning stage and conclusion of a sociological project, individually or as part of a team. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to diagnose the social dynamics behind personal problems by using sociological imagination. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to define social problems at local, national, and global level, and offer new policies for solutions. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to apply commonly-used computer programs for data collection and analysis in sociological research. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to develop a socially responsible, scientific and ethical perspective regarding the collection, analysis, interpretation and presentation of data. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to analyze different aspects of the social world by drawing on the knowledge produced by other disciplines of the social sciences. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to constantly renew herself/himself professionally by following scientific and technological developments in sociology and social research. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect sociological data and communicate with sociologists and other social scientists in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..